Yeah, I saw on the pdf. It's ridiculous. Nintendo has always been a secretive company and all you see across the detailed "scoring" is "no information", which certainly doesn't mean Nintendo isn't taking part in these practises (practices?). They simply don't release information so openly about it. Anyway, as a company they've done feckloads to improve life in other ways.

This riles me, because it's such a short sighted and troll-type study.

Me no likey greenpeace atm kthx.

No kidding, I keep seeing Greenpeace on all my favorite gaming sites. Don't support yellow journalism, dammit!

Yeah, who ever manages to get any information whatsoever out of Nintendo. Greenpeace sure threw this one together though, it's no excuse.

Mind you, a European release Date of TBA from Nintendo does definitely mean 'After Christmas.'

I think I've read an article about how their office (at least the main office) use 70% recycled paper and your every single booklets/manuals they produce are using recycled paper too. Does it count?

Plus there's so many "no information" about Nintendo on greanpeace article.

How?? Why?? Have you actually GONE to Nintendo's website and check it out yourself? Someone at Kotaku did and they actually have a section about environmental information (http://www.nintendo.com/corp/faq.jsp#environment) They do list some information, but not the information the Greenpeace was looking for. So they fail them? Please tell me how that makes sense, because I don't see it.

I can't believe anyone listens to Greenpeace. They're unprofessional, unethical bastards. They've always been chocked full of misleading info and straight up lies. Support greener, cleaner practices, but do NOT support Greenpeace.

Reading the environment section, I remember when we stopped getting plastic shells for our gameboy games. I liked them.

You DO understand most of us are pissed because they didn't do ANY research, right? Just because they don't post it online doesn't mean its not public knowledge. Also, as many posters on other sites have stated, Greenpeace only researched each company's website for their "environmental practices". If they wanted to do a truly unbiased article, they should have called the companies up personally to get the info, and leave the website as an extra point or two in the grading.

Nintendo got the system, games, and even customer service all to near perfection. They even sent out "Free" Wiimote jackets ...
(yes I got mine, though very ugly but it was FREE)
...but from all those, they just can't add content in the environmental section; especially at this point of time where Global Warming is a HUGE issue.

With Al Gore running around preaching about global warming and the Kyoto Treaty up and running (may I add also started in Kyoto Japan in 1997). It's kinda hard to miss. For a company that only concentrates on Video Games, that is pretty weak in comparison to MS, Sony, Samsung, and Toshiba and/with their multiple sectors. LMAO and Sony has the lowest standards in customers service too (well in my opinion, and other physical proof threads in this site)

Hmmm... are you serious Gumby?

Of course we felt hurts. You know why? because this is DSFanboy website where Nintendo fanboys gather together and will try to denial this.

Well likedonduan, even though its a Nintendo fanboy site. A lot of these people still reject the fact that they are fanboys.

Famous fanboy qoutes:
"well, I own both systems (like most of us do) I know what's best, so this sucks...."
"Don't call me a fanboy just b/c I love to buy the best, ..... does suck"
etc.

And these ppl I find humor in bothering. But since the fact that you do admit at being a fanboy, likedonduan, well then, enough said.

Just like how PSP fanboys love to go into DS Fanboy site and vise versa. I love to bother just fanboys.