Truth be told, most DS games don't take
too long to beat. It's when we start feverishly collecting and completing, though, that our time gets sucked into a vacuous hole. Do you fancy yourself an item collector? Will you usually aim to complete everything you possibly can before beating a game?
If you're not sure whether you're a completionist or not, here are some signs:
- You still refuse to beat Phantom Hourglass until you get all the ship parts
- You'll continue to play Geometry Wars until you have every drone leveled up to the maximum, even the ones you never use
- You just gotta catch 'em all
Or, does getting the full 100% not interest you? Is beating a game with the minimum requirements necessary a-okay by your standards? Then again, maybe you fall somewhere in between?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
4-13-2008 @ 10:51AM
Morose said...
I fall somewhere in between in that it depends on the game. for RPGs, I'm not, as it would just take too long and be too repetitive. for platformers, i usually am a completionist (particularly Kirby games). for Professor Layton, I had to solve them all.
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 10:54AM
Roto13 said...
It depends on the game and what I have to do to get 100%. For example, I finished Wind Waker with all of the figurines, heart pieces, sea charts, and everything else. All in a first-playthrough. (I got all of the figurines in one run instead of getting some of them in one run and the rest in the new game plus)
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 10:54AM
C02M0 said...
im the kind thet finish the games , not collect stupid stuff after it .
its less fun , take for example kirby games ,
I finished the 8 godamn levels and the boss , why whould i wanna go over ALL of them agin ?
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 11:07AM
GatorSax2010 said...
I'm a completionist, definitely (or I try to be, at least). It still irks me that I don't ave the last Cheato page in Banjo-Tooie. I can't beat stupid Canary Mary in her second race in Cloud Cuckooland!
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 12:26PM
WhatIsThatThing said...
Get a turbo controller. Or take a coin or spoon and rub it on the button repeatedly. I personally used the turbo controller method. And I feel no remorse about it.
4-13-2008 @ 11:16AM
Neo Senku said...
depends on the game
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 11:29AM
Tyler said...
I tend to try to complete the game fully... Pokemon, Metroid, Final Fantasies, Tales of games... I usually try my hardest to get "100%"
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 11:40AM
tamriel said...
I don't switch games often: once I pop one in that I like, it pretty much stays there until I'm tired of it for a good while. For many games, this means I am not a thorough completist, as once I've beaten the game on some path, I have a satisfied feeling of being able to pull away from it. However, while I'm playing the game through, I tend to explore and grind a fair share: I don't play in a hurry if I like the game.
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 11:51AM
NomadFox said...
I can be, but really only with Castlevania.It's just fun to experiment with all the equipment
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 12:00PM
ArmiMaan said...
I never used to be a completionist because I spent a lot on gaming and there was always something else to play. I'd just quickly wrap up one game and move on to the next.
These days, however, I've severely cut back on the number of games that I buy, and now I play until I 100% everything before buying something new. It really helps keep the budget in check.
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 12:06PM
Jay Walker said...
I also buy very few games so I go for completion often. Right now I am trying to get to rank two star on 150 cc at the Special Cup in Mario Kart DS. I play this grand prix over and over again and I restart if I get any bad time or get hit by like three lightning bolts or blue shells.
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 12:15PM
ILPC said...
I'm a completionist, definitely, that's the fun part for me.
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 12:19PM
Alex Gorzen said...
I always go for 100% because I don't want to miss anything game/story wise, but this usually makes me bored with the game after a while. I usually lose interest after beating the main story of the game. If friends are playing the game at the same time as me, then this usually keeps my interest longer than it would have otherwise.
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 12:20PM
hvnlysoldr said...
Depends on the game. I put in 100 hours into FFTA before resetting in order to get those blasted Goblins for my monster tamer and blue mage and now have 300 hours. Combined I've put in over 500 hours into Pokemon at the least. My Blue version had reached 255 hours twice I think.
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 12:21PM
Ihar `Philips` Filipau said...
I rarely finish games.
Usually last levels made very hard. And as and award for winning ... you are getting "The End."
But it depends. There are some games which tell a story - finishing them might be interesting. There are some games which are all about process - RTS, TBS, RPG - there are really few incentives to finish them completely. If you are happy with particular levels you will be playing them until complete boredom induce brain damage.
But then again, many games try to increment complexity level so much that even story telling games end up being about process: do { block, block, block, jump left, stab } while (!boss->is_defeated); If game overloads me with the boring repetitive tasks - and i do not enjoy process - finishing game is more of punishment than of excitement.
Even less compelled am I about "completing" games 100%. It's just to boring. And since I'm soft-core gamers - not interested in achievements - I probably never really even considered completing a game. Exception is CivIV which I accidentally won using all nations using every win scenario available. But I were enjoying myself, not trying to complete 100% score table of the game. Talk about adult gamer.
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 12:47PM
Chazz said...
It really just depends on the game. I tried to get every pokeman, but i stopped at about 300. I'm currently trying to complete everyone of brawl's challenges, but i don't think i will ever beat them all. some of them are just too hard and i wasted all of my hammers already. Sigh
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 1:50PM
gukid said...
I liked to be a completionist back in the day... but nowadays games drag drag drag with the useless content, it's almost intolerable. Specifically speaking, the Tales games, newer Final Fantasies, and even the DS Castlevanias are getting to be this way. The Battle Network games are probably the worst offenders. So much stuff you would NEVER find without using gamefaqs really ruins the experience of doing it yourself... I'd much rather a game that allows you to complete it in a reasonable amount of time (say 20-30 hours for rpgs, around 15 hours for anything else) and is fun enough that you would want to play through it a 2nd or 3rd time.
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 2:37PM
dustin said...
I used to be a completionist way back when... but the interest fizzled when I finally caught all 151 pokémon in pokémon red... and got practically nothing in return.
I forget... what exactly do you get? A Congratulations and a diploma or something? well, it was lame
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 3:35PM
Mr Khan said...
depends on the type of game
Smash Bros games i always go for the 100%, same with Metroids. Pokemon, though, i haven't "Caught 'em all" since Pokemon Blue, and that was only through liberal use of the Missingno family of glitches, to get infinite Master Balls and to get Safari-Zone exclusive monsters to appear outside of it
Platformers i go for the 100%, Racing games too, Zelda games (and most other adventure titles) yes, strategy games no, FPSes yes, Puzzle games i never play anyway
Reply
4-13-2008 @ 3:47PM
Puddles said...
I'm absolutely not a completionist. I like to have fun with a game and play it through to the end. If the gameplay is really great, then I might put in some extra hours getting more stuff - and in fact, that's the ideal situation - but way too often by the time I've finished, the gameplay has gotten somewhat repetitive and so there's not much incentive to get extra stuff.
FFX was an example of a game that I played a LOT more than I had to, just because it was fun.
Reply